Hyper vs Madgicx
Both show up when paid media teams shortlist AI tools. The honest side-by-side, no pay-to-rank.
| Dimension | Hyper | Madgicx |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | One autonomous agent across Google, Meta, TikTok, LinkedIn, Amazon. | Autonomous budget, audiences, and creative analytics for Meta. |
| Best for | Agencies and growth teams tired of stitching five single-channel tools together. | DTC ecommerce teams running Meta as their main paid channel on a budget. |
| Mode | executes | executes |
| Price | from $49/mo | from $44/mo |
| Channels | GOOG·META·TT·LI·AMZ | META·GOOG |
| ▲ Watch | A younger category than the point tools. You are trusting one agent with cross-channel execution, so start gated. | Meta-centric. Depth on Google and other channels is thin, so multi-channel teams still need separate coverage. |
Choose Hyper if…
Agencies and growth teams tired of stitching five single-channel tools together.
Choose Madgicx if…
DTC ecommerce teams running Meta as their main paid channel on a budget.
scout ~ $ ask --ai
Hyper vs Madgicx for paid media: which should I pick?